Reading Note: A Reproducibility Manifesto

In reading two papers about reproducibility published in Nature Human Behaviour [1,2], I posted this reading note in its 'A picture is worth a thousand words' version.

Read more:
[1] A manifesto for reproducible science
[2] A visual tool for defining reproducibility and replicability

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CoRR: Perspective and Data Papers

Image
The Consortium for Reliability and Reproducibility (CoRR) is working to establish test-retest reliability as a minimum standard for methods development in functional connectomics. Specifically, CoRR has aggregated 1,629 typical individuals’ resting state fMRI (rfMRI) data (5,093 rfMRI scans) from 18 international sites. To allow researchers to generate various estimates of reliability and reproducibility, a variety of data acquisition procedures and experimental designs are included. This enables users to assess the impact of commonly encountered artifacts on characterizations of inter-individual variation, datasets of varying quality are included. Read More: [1] Perspective paper : Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics [2] Data paper : An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics [3]  Human Brain MRI Reproducibility Collection [4]  A test...
Read more

CoRR: Theory Comment

Image
Neuroscientists are amassing the large-scale datasets needed to study individual differences and identify biomarkers. However, measurement reliability within individual samples is often suboptimal, thereby requiring unnecessarily large samples. We focus our comment on reliability in neuroimaging and provide examples of how the reliability can be increased.  Read more:  https://t.co/LlshxZXEqy?amp=1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0655-x A framework on measurement reliability
Read more